Tulsi Kamala Biden, Kamala's Terrible Legacy as Attorney General , and more!



Tulsi Kamala Biden, Kamala’s Terrible Legacy as Attorney General , and more! ——————————————————— Keep Up With THE CONVO COUCH …




26 thoughts on “Tulsi Kamala Biden, Kamala's Terrible Legacy as Attorney General , and more!

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Harris is the Establishment's Trojan Horse:

    Caitlin Johnstone said in her piece "Kamala Harris is an Oligarch's Wet Dream": 'Harris is everything the US empire’s unelected power establishment wants in a politician: charismatic, commanding, and completely unprincipled. In that sense she’s like Obama, only better'. Axelrod pointed out that Harris is a long time proponent of busing and just engineered that distraction to get noticed while everyone that second night avoided Foreign Policy. Harris went on to blame Trump for being the greatest National Security threat to the US for being willinging to negotiate with Korea & Russia, i.e., not being Chicken Hawkish enough. IMHO Gabbard was not defending Biden or Obama for abdicating any Foreign Policy to Killary & Molesta, for spreading Terrorism with 3 bombs/drones per minute….she was exposing Kamala for Hypocrisy. Biden, as you have already said "Needs to go sit down." Gabbard is brandishing the only sword against the Conspiracy of Deception, & Illegal Regime Change Assassination Wars…JFK & RFK were the last Peace Advocates. Gabbard unlike Obama is qualified, principaled, and willing to stare the War-Mongering Media and the MIC down. RFK said "Progress(ives) is a nice word. But Change is its motivator and Change has Many Enemies." & "There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things."

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    tulsi hates kamal's guts for a while. if u listen to her first rogan podcast with rogan, she named her and booker as two senators who were against her first step bill because they did not want to give a win to trump. i the bill that she and van jones worked on to help change the criminal justice system when it comes to non violent offenders. the two black senators tried to stop it. Hypocritical to act all about black ppl, but try to block a legislation that helps black ppl don't go to jail for marijuana. that interview was i think in september, before she announced her run, so she called them out

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Hey convo couch, I am inundated on Facebook with friends with threads that always call Dem socialist communist. Have you found a good way to explain the difference without coming off as an asswhole? I think the reeducation of right wing bubble connections is important to the cuase, but discord always breaks down. Suggestions fam?

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    There are many of us here down under who watch the convo couch… keep up the good work.

    Down here we’ve had a fair bit of erosion to our country’s progressive policies… so I often refer to yours and Niko’s shows.

    We also have a good satire show for Australia that do have some US related clips… Check them out, they’re hilarious… they’re called JuiceMedia.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    I don't think she pulls from Bernie, she pulls from center. The cfpb is not symbolic,

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Kamala is more than likely a cold hearted malignant Narcissis. There isn't a drop of empathy in her toxic gas tank.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    If Whoppi Goldberg is a Democrat, she's a very conservative one. From many of the things she's said, she doesn't seem to remember being poor probably because she became wealthy at a young age.

    Joe Biden isn't the KKK. He's the White Citizens Council.

    BTW, Kamala Harris is a total horror show.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    AOC, or Ilhan can end Kamala’s Run with a single tweet, but I don’t think they would unless Kamala attacked Bernie.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    https://youtu.be/93kUCnBFotg
    i invite fuck boy booker and fake ass corrupt state prosecutor oppressor kamala to my hood, my boy put this out when we were in drug court, b4 prison time, come to the heart of MY HOOD COME AND SEE FAKE ASS CUNTS, cmon with the fam, pasta you did an interview without saying it, it comes across fake as hell, be your self Pasta, you are great without repeating that pronoun as it isnt needed. enjoy my bys song bout our hood and the video of the places we live here in the 321, we hard core like porno flick bitches lmao enjoy, i invite the fake as fuckboy polaticians and that cunt kamala.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    If this was just about defending someone innocent of the smears thrown against them, she'd be defending Bernie day after day, when they make up shit about him, like calling him racist and sexist. But, no, she defends Biden. Once I could write it off, but this is an attempt to get on the Biden train.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    i suspect that the Dem rule against candidates interrupting, resulting in their time (30 seconds) being reduced, may be directed against Tulsi, who pointed out where candidates were repeating false information, as when one of the 'bulk' candidates was accusing the wrong country of having been involved in 9/11, and she pointed out that it was Al Qaeda that she and others signed up to fight and there was at least one more correction she made, although at the moment I can't recall what it was… it certainly won't be intended for use against the corporate candidates, but against the 3 worth-while ones: Bernie,Tulsi and Mike Gravell.

    This following illustrates one of the points at which the American people should have taken note and begun to demand an actual democracy and clean elections with a Fair Vote system and a variety of political parties – and easy voting – encouraged . But there was no internet at the time… now there is.

    https://www.lwv.org/newsroom/press-releases/league-refuses-help-perpetrate-fraud

    League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud"
    10/3/1988

    NEWS RELEASE
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
    October 3, 1988

    LEAGUE REFUSES TO "HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD"

    WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

    WASHINGTON, DC —"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing its sponsorship of the presidential debate scheduled for mid-October because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter," League President Nancy M. Neuman said today.

    "It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions," Neuman said. "The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."

    Neuman said that the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on
    September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated "behind closed doors" and vas presented to the League as "a done deal," she said, its 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation.

    Most objectionable to the League, Neuman said, were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings. Neuman called "outrageous" the campaigns' demands that they control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues.

    "The campaigns' agreement is a closed-door masterpiece," Neuman said. "Never in the history of the League of Women Voters have two candidates' organizations come to us with such stringent, unyielding and self-serving demands."

    Neuman said she and the League regretted that the American people have had no real opportunities to judge the presidential nominees outside of campaign-controlled environments.

    "On the threshold of a new millenium, this country remains the brightest hope for all who cherish free speech and open debate," Neuman said. "Americans deserve to see and hear the men who would be president face each other in a debate on the hard and complex issues critical to our progress into the next century."

    Neuman issued a final challenge to both Vice President Bush and Governor Dukakis to "rise above your handlers and agree to join us in presenting the fair and full discussion the American public expects of a League of Women Voters debate."

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    I still hate the lengthy intro to these sessions. Please trim this off your intros.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    @37:00 She speaking facts! Kamala is black but she's not 1 of us that are born from the 400 year progeny of slavery

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Thanks for the clip of Tulsi on CBS (local channel?)– I like what Tulsi said about Biden. She was
    so concise in critiquing the attack on Biden and saying "we" should all be above that kind of campaigning.
    Another reason why I think Tulsi is a leader.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Yes, Tulsi's criticism of Kamala will elevate her and/or Bernie.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Tulsi's chief problem is that she does not talk about the domestic issues important to the average voter as Sanders does. Sure, us minimum wage folks are down for an end to endless war but we are immediately concerned with economics (jobs), health care and education. She's a one trick pony.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    ¡you two "wonder twins" babble too much – stick to the title of your video – written at 5:49 PM Pacific Daylight Savings Time on Tuesday, 9 July 2019

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    Tulsi exercised good judgment here, as per usual, and spoke the truth. You can say that Biden has been a senior agent for a racist state, which is true, but also true of Obama. Biden has occasionally been condescending towards blacks — notably towards Obama in 2008 — but there's little evidence that he's personally invested in racist ideologies. Rather, he's committed to US imperial hegemony and its imperative of capital accumulation. This imperialist-capitalist ideology, which dominates US strategic thinking, certainly has racist effects, but race is not actually its operative concept. Indeed, the capitalist ruling class has been more than happy to sell out working class whites, and diversification at the level of symbolic representation has been one of the ruling class's most effective strategies of dissimulation, masking imperialist white privilege (i.e. in the form of inherited wealth and connections to powerful networks) under a charade of diversity.

  • March 26, 2020 at 2:26 am
    Permalink

    What is Tulsi's Black Agenda? Because if she ain't got one black folks WILL NOT support her. She wont touch the topic of #REPERATIONS so black folks not impressed with her either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com